Join us on:

Buy a Book

Sign-Up for Newletter
Email address:


Family Farming: Bucolic Myth vs. Economic Reality

Why Does Superior Food Production Generate Inferior Income?


Though many small-scale local, organic farmers are highly revered and supported by their communities, the hard truth is that it is very difficult to make a living growing the kind of food everyone wants to eat.

How is the food system going to be revolutionized when even our best local farmers are quitting due to the economics of small-scale diversified farming?

Yes, the good food movement has come a long way in the last 20 years. More people have come to understand that small-scale diversified farming strengthens local economies, enhances environmental stewardship, and contributes to human health. Consumers have come to demand pesticide-free, just-harvested, nutrient-dense food, and they want to know that environmental sustainability, human and animal welfare, and local prosperity come with it.

In addition, many scientists now recognize that the majority of small-scale farmers carefully manage their lands to sustain remarkably high levels of productivity despite using fewer agricultural inputs. In fact, United Nations research shows an inverse relationship between land size and productivity. Small-scale farmers across the globe utilize innovative land management techniques to be highly productive with their intimate knowledge of local ecologies.

However, despite the growth in the number of farmer’s markets, CSAs, and local food in the grocery stores, many small-scale farmers struggle financially.

Too many hardworking, highly skilled farmers quit simply because they can’t afford to pay their bills.

Yet, if we want the majority of our food to come from diversified small-scale, local farms, we must increase the number of young farmers rather than watch them try out farming only to move on to more lucrative occupations.

Improving the income of small-scale farmers amidst the prevailing “cheap food” mentality is a daunting task, but we can begin by addressing the underlying issues. We must:

1. Shift government agricultural subsidies away from monoculture, large-scale commodity production to diversified small-scale farms.

The artificially low commodity prices induced by subsidies economically disadvantage the farms that do not receive them—typically smaller and diversified operations. In developing countries, local farmers are forced out of the marketplace and even off their land when subsidized goods enter foreign markets at costs that unsubsidized local farmers cannot compete with. As a result, around the world, unhealthy processed foods have become cheaper than healthy fresh foods.

Diversified farms that produce high quality fresh vegetables and grass-fed meats and milk should be subsidized rather than commodities that end up in unhealthy processed foods.

2. Reduce competition from large-scale monoculture-style operations that attempt to capitalize on the demand for ethically produced food.

In many cases, the USDA certified organic food in mainstream grocery stores comes from farms and businesses that do not provide the benefits to society that the term “organic” originally signified. What was once a movement led by small scale, diverse, local, family farms has now become dominated by industrial-scale farms that simply substitute organic inputs into mono-cropping production systems — or even worse — cheap imports from potentially fraudulent sources. These operations are corporate entities, distributing food nationwide, sometimes globally; their production systems do not always incorporate ecological principles or benefit local communities.

Today, the words “organic,” “local,” and “family farm” have all been co-opted by agribusinesses in an attempt to exploit the increased demand for quality food. Educating consumers to “know their local farmers” and, when locally produced foods are not available, to buy from ethical organic brands is paramount to reclaiming original organic principles.

3. Increase opportunities for farmers to own farmland close to their markets.

Farmland close to cities is much more expensive than land further from town. Often new farmers are forced to live far from their customer base, making marketing much more difficult and expensive.

When farmers are forced to buy land far from their consumer base, consumers lose the opportunity to experience the farm.

Programs that finance and support alternative ownership of farmland close to town need to increase and be supported. For example, Equity Trust is a nonprofit that actually pays the difference between the agricultural and market value so farmers can afford to buy farmland that is of interest to developers and the rural estate market. USDA subsidies for low interest loans for farmers also should be expanded. Farmers deserve the opportunity to own their own land, and to farm close enough to their market that their consumers are able to know them and their farming practices. Educating consumers on the ethics of food production needs to continue. The benefits from sustainable production to the environment, local economies, and human health are well studied but not reinforced in our culture. Homegrown food from highly diverse, sustainable farms can be more expensive than processed food and unobtainable to many people.

Unfortunately, short-term savings result in long-term costs affiliated with pollution, failing local economies, and skyrocketing healthcare costs. What would the true price of processed food be if subsidies to commodity crops were eliminated, and the costs of pollution, migrant labor, and healthcare were incorporated?

Unless we as a society begin to tackle these issues in earnest, with the goal of achieving a paradigm shift in our food supply system, nothing will change. Small- scale, family farmers will come and go while monoculture agriculture will continue to assail us with pollution and inferior nutrition.

All of the momentum that has built up over the past decade surrounding responsible growing and eating will mean very little if an honest effort isn’t made to support the people capable of producing superior food. Learn more at A version of this article with references is available at

Reprinted with permission from the Cultivator, The Cornucopia Institute,


Locally Delicious, Inc. is a non-profit organization engaged in education about the benefits of eating locally grown, organic food. We create and support projects designed to increase production of local organic food, with an emphasis on making good food accessible to all. We advocate for a healthy and sustainable local food system.

Latest Blogs

  • Shrubs Blog

    Making Shrubs   While visiting my family up in Seattle for the holidays last year I stumbled into a...

  • Inglorius Fruits and Vegetables

     Inglorious Fruit and Vegetables See what one supermarket in France is doing with perfectly good but...

  • Bees in Trouble

    The list of crops that simply won’t grow without honey bees is a long one: Apples, cucumbers,...

  • Food Blog

    {jcomments off}Seasonal Food Blog is Back The Locally Delicious organization is happy to announce...

Featured Event

 Bee-Friendly Gardening

Is your favorite hardware/garden store featuring lots of poisons but few organic alternatives? Is the Roundup display huge, but you have to ask where the agricultural-grade vinegar is? Are imidacloprids rampant? Time to chat with the manager. For example, Ace Hardware is a franchise, and the individual managers make many of the decisions about what to sell.

For information on imidacloprids:



Joomla templates by Joomlashine